1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 187 F.Supp.2d
  5. 187 F.Supp.2d 68 (2002)
 

ULLRICH v. LINOTYPE-HELL CO.

No. 00-CV-4316 (JS).

187 F.Supp.2d 68 (2002)

Walter ULLRICH, Plaintiff, v. LINOTYPE-HELL CO. and Heidelberg USA, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

February 7, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neal Brickman, New York City, for Plaintiff.

David R. Kresser, Fisher & Phillips LLP, Atlanta, GA, Richard G. Kass, Rains & Pogrebin, P.C., Mineola, NY, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SEYBERT, District Judge.

Walter Ullrich ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint against Linotype-Hell Co. ("Linotype") and Heidelberg USA, Inc. ("Heidelberg") (Linotype and Heidelberg shall be referred to collectively herein as "Defendants") alleging two causes of action against Defendants. Plaintiff's first cause of action alleges that Defendants violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases