1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 20 N.J.
  5. 20 N.J. Tax 233 (2002)
 

URSO & BROWN, INC. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAXATION

20 N.J. Tax 233 (2002)

URSO & BROWN, INC., PREDECESSOR TO AL GAR/THE DISPLAY CONNECTION, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division.

Decided July 8, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Leib, Clifton, argued the cause for appellant (Harold Leib & Associates, attorneys; Mr. Leib, on the brief).

Mala Narayanan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (David Samson, Attorney General, attorney; Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Narayanan, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER and PETRELLA.

PER CURIAM.

Urso & Brown, Inc. challenges the Tax Court's determination that the Director, Division of Taxation, correctly imposed sales and use taxes on purchases of prototypes of point-of-purchase displays. Point-of-purchase displays are merchandising models used by vendors to market goods to customers.

The Tax Court, in a published opinion, Urso & Brown, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 19 N.J.Tax 246...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases