1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 80 S.W.3d
  5. 80 S.W.3d 161 (2002)
 

MILLER v. KENNEDY & MINSHEW, PROFESSIONAL

No. 2-01-408-CV.

80 S.W.3d 161 (2002)

William J. MILLER, Appellant, v. KENNEDY & MINSHEW, PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION a/k/a Kennedy, Minshew, Campbell & Morris, P.C., and a/k/a Kennedy, Minshew & Campbell, P.C., and Robert Minshew, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

June 6, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick R. Zlotucha, Law Office of Frederick R. Zlotucha, San Antonio, for Appellant.

James M. Morris, and Jack G. Kennedy, Kennedy & Minshew, P.C., Sherman, Larry B. Sullivant, The Sullivant Law Firm, Gainesville, for Appellee.

PANEL A: CAYCE, C.J.; DAY and WALKER, JJ.

OPINION

SUE WALKER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION.

Appellant William J. Miller ("Miller") seeks our review of the trial court's order holding his supersedeas bond insufficient. See Tex.R.App. P. 24.4. In two issues, Miller contends that the trial court erred by finding the supersedeas bond insufficient because there is no "basis in law or fact to reach such conclusion" and the trial court does not have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases