ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Danyle Hurst ("Hurst") appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of unlawful use of a weapon. Hurst claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the state failed to prove every element of the offense of unlawful use of a weapon beyond a reasonable doubt. Particularly, Hurst argues that the state did not present sufficient evidence from which the trier of fact could find, beyond...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
