ZISAPEL v. PARAMUS BOROUGH


20 N.J. Tax 209 (2002)

ZOHAR ZISAPEL C/O REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, PLAINTIFF, v. PARAMUS BOROUGH, DEFENDANT.

Tax Court of New Jersey.

August 8, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary D. Gordon, for plaintiff (Feinstein Raiss & Kelin, attorneys).

Russell P. Huntington, for Allied Securities Co. (Huntington Carver, LLP, attorneys).

Joseph A. O'Neill, for defendant (Pojanowski Trawinski, PC, attorneys).


PIZZUTO, J.T.C.

This matter presents the question of whether the purchaser of real property is bound by an agreement made between the seller and the taxing district, as part of the settlement of a tax appeal, to stabilize the assessed valuation of the property under the Freeze Act (N.J.S.A. 54:51A-8). The agreement at issue was made after the transfer of the property, which occurred during the year covered by the appeal.

The property is an office building...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases