LLOYD v. ASHCROFT

No. Civ.A. 97-1287(PLF).

208 F.Supp.2d 8 (2002)

Arthur L. LLOYD, Plaintiff, v. John ASHCROFT, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 27, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Veronice Annette Holt, Washington, DC, Everald Fitzgerald Thompson, Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Michael Anthony Humphrey, Edith M. Shine, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, Joe Lazar, U.S. Marshal's Service, Arlington, VA, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial or remittitur of the verdict, plaintiff's opposition and defendant's reply. Upon consideration of the arguments of the parties and the entire record herein, the Court grants defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law in part and denies it in part. The Court denies defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases