1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 37 P.3d
  5. 37 P.3d 172 (2002)
 

IN RE CONDUCT OF LACKEY

(OSB 98-33; SC S48552)

37 P.3d 172 (2002)

333 Or. 215

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF David N. LACKEY, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided January 10, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David N. Lackey, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs in propria persona.

Martha M. Hicks, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With her on the brief was Wilson C. Muhlheim, Eugene.

Before GILLETTE, Presiding Justice, and DURHAM, LEESON, RIGGS, De MUNIZ, and BALMER, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with twice revealing client confidences and secrets in violation of Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 4-101(B) and ORS 9.460(3) (each set out below).1 The accused defended, in part, on the theory that his disclosures revealed allegedly corrupt government practices and, therefore, were exempt from the prohibitions in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases