1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 44 P.3d
  5. 44 P.3d 164 (2002)
 

ROBERSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

No. 1 CA-CV 00-0555.

44 P.3d 164 (2002)

202 Ariz. 286

Jerry C. ROBERSON and Jean M. Roberson, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and Richard C. Wong, an individual, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

April 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Treon, Strick, Lucia & Aguirre, P.A. by Arthur G. Newman, Jr., Gerald J. Strick, Teri K. Raven, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellees.

Thomas & Elardo, P.C. by Benjamin C. Thomas, Neal B. Thomas, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellants.

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart") and Richard C. Wong ("Wong")1 appeal from a jury verdict and judgment that Wal-Mart breached an implied contract when it terminated the employment of appellee Jerry Roberson ("Roberson"). We conclude that, as a matter of law, Roberson was an "at-will" employee and that the trial court therefore erred in denying Wal-Mart's motions for judgment as a matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases