STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. SESTILE

No. 2D01-1853.

821 So.2d 1244 (2002)

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Appellant, v. Judith SESTILE and Julie Barrett, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 31, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Weihmuller and Anthony J. Russo of Butler Burnette Pappas, Tampa, for Appellant.

Alan F. Wagner of Wagner, Vaughan & McLaughlin, P.A., Tampa, and Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, P.A., Miami, for Appellees.


NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Judith Sestile and Julie Barrett are insureds under State Farm automobile insurance policies providing personal injury protection and medical payments insurance. Their policies require State Farm to pay "80% of the reasonable charges incurred for necessary" medical procedures because of "an accident resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle." See also § 627.736(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995) (requiring PIP carriers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases