1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 771 N.E.2d
  5. 771 N.E.2d 1246 (2002)
 

RHODES v. STATE

No. 43A05-0110-CR-463.

771 N.E.2d 1246 (2002)

Dale R. RHODES, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

July 29, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth R. Martin, Goshen, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant.

Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Nicole M. Schuster, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Rhodes argues that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial because the jury in his case was able to hear substantial evidence of other misconduct besides that for which he was on trial. In addition, Rhodes asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions. Because we find that the introduction of improper character evidence was so prejudicial that it rendered a fair trial impossible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases