ERNY v. ESTATE OF MEROLA


792 A.2d 1208 (2002)

171 N.J. 86

Christine ERNY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The ESTATE OF Antoinette T. MEROLA, Milton Merola, Matthew Erny, Andrea D. Gambino, State of New Jersey, Anka Construction, Inc., John Does No. 1-5 (fictitious names being the persons or corporations intended), XYZ Corp. No. 1-5 (fictitious names being the partnerships and/or corporations intended), Defendants, and Roy Russo, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 30, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anita R. Hotchkiss, Morristown, argued the cause for appellant (Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, attorneys; Ms. Hotchkiss and Linda Pissott Reig, on the briefs).

Edwin R. Matthews, Short Hills, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Matthews, attorney; Mr. Matthews and Robert J. Pansulla, on the briefs).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by LaVECCHIA, J.

The choice-of-law question presented in this appeal requires the Court to decide whether New Jersey or New York law should apply to determine the joint and several liability of the defendants. The underlying occurrence was an automobile accident in New Jersey that involved a New Jersey plaintiff and two New York defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases