1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 117 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 117 Cal.Rptr.2d 82 (2002)
 

PAUL v. FRIEDMAN

No. B142814.

117 Cal.Rptr.2d 82 (2002)

95 Cal.App.4th 853

Geoffrey Scott PAUL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Michael E. FRIEDMAN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

Rehearing Denied February 26, 2002.

Review Denied May 15, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keesal, Young & Logan, Samuel A. Keesal, Jr., Neal S. Robb and Dawn M. Schock, Long Beach, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Ohashi & Priver and Mark S. Priver, Pasadena, for Defendant and Appellant.

BOLAND, J.*

SUMMARY

This case involves the question whether a lawyer's investigative acts in the course of prosecuting his clients' arbitration claims against a securities broker were acts in furtherance of his free speech rights within the meaning of California's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute.

We conclude the lawyer's acts alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases