1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 777 N.E.2d
  5. 777 N.E.2d 1177 (2002)
 

MULLINS v. QUALKENBUSH

No. 59A01-0203-CV-0108.

777 N.E.2d 1177 (2002)

Merle W. MULLINS, Appellant-Defendant, v. Darrell QUALKENBUSH, Ginger Qualkenbush, Appellees-Plaintiffs.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

November 6, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia K. Woodring, Shawn M. Sullivan, Terrell, Baugh, Salmon & Born, LLP, Evansville, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

James C. Tucker, Jennifer A. Tucker, Tucker and Tucker, P.C., Paoli, IN, Attorneys for Appellees.

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Merle Mullins appeals the trial court's grant of a new trial limited solely to the issue of damages. In particular, Mullins contends that because liability was hotly contested and the evidence could have supported a verdict for either party, the trial court should have granted a new trial on the issues of liability and damages. Because we find that liability was hotly contested and the evidence could have supported...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases