SEIDENBERG v. SUMMIT BANK


791 A.2d 1068 (2002)

348 N.J. Super. 243

Richard SEIDENBERG and Eric Raymond, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUMMIT BANK, Corporate Dynamics and Philadelphia Benefits Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 28, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven E. Angstreich, Philadelphia, PA, argued the cause for appellants (Levy, Angstreich, Finney, Baldante, Rubenstein & Coren, attorneys; Mr. Angstreich, on the brief).

John J. Murphy, III, argued the cause for respondents (Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, attorneys, Cherry Hill; Mr. Murphy and Stephen B. Nolan, Newark, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, WINKELSTEIN and CLARKSON S. FISHER, Jr.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CLARKSON S. FISHER, Jr., J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

After settling all their disputes concerning the express terms of their commercial transaction, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint alleging a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The Law Division dismissed the action, finding that plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which relief may be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases