PER CURIAM.
Concerning the appellant's argument that the trial court was in error when it imposed equal concurrent sentences of imprisonment under both the Habitual Felony Offender Statute and the Prison Release Reoffender Act, the State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in entering the sentence that it imposed. See Grant v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.