1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 77 S.W.3d
  5. 77 S.W.3d 104 (2002)
 

PARHAM v. STATE

No. 24671.

77 S.W.3d 104 (2002)

Julius PARHAM, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

June 14, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Allen, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General and Sara L. Trower, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Presiding Judge.

Julius Parham ("Movant") appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Movant alleges that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the sufficiency of the evidence as an issue in Movant's direct appeal. We affirm.

On January 18, 1997, Movant, Heidi Kidd ("Kidd"), Andrea Fuzzell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases