1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 55 P.3d
  5. 55 P.3d 126 (2002)
 

IN RE DEROSE

No. 01SA297.

55 P.3d 126 (2002)

In the Matter of James DeROSE, Attorney-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

September 16, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Gleason, Attorney Regulation Counsel, James S. Sudler, Assistant Regulation Counsel, Denver, Colorado, Attorney for Petitioner.

James M. DeRose, Pro Se, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, Attorney for Attorney-Respondent.

Justice HOBBS delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Respondent James M. DeRose appeals the decision and order of the Hearing Board disbarring him. The Hearing Board found that disbarment was an appropriate sanction based upon the finding that DeRose pled guilty to a felony constituting a violation of both C.R.C.P. 251.5(b) and Colo. RPC 8.4(b). We agree with the Hearing Board that disbarment is the appropriate sanction based on the offense and the aggravating circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases