1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 805 A.2d
  5. 805 A.2d 1007 (2002)
 

FORREST v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

No. 01-CV-1101.

805 A.2d 1007 (2002)

Bruce G. FORREST, Appellant, v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and Verizon Internet Services, Inc., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 29, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victoria S. Nugent, with whom Michael D. Hausfeld, Gary E. Mason and Alexander E. Barnett were on the brief, Washington, DC, for appellant.

Guy Miller Struve, with whom Harry T. Jones, Jr., Washington, DC, and Scott W. Muller were on the brief, for appellees.

Before STEADMAN and REID, Associate Judges, and NEWMAN, Senior Judge.

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

The question in this case is whether a forum selection clause mandating that claims be brought in Virginia should be applied to appellant's purported class action involving consumers' attempts to register for and use Verizon Internet Services, Inc.'s ("VIS") digital subscriber line ("DSL") service. We hold that enforcement of this clause is reasonable and that all of appellant's claims fall within...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases