PER CURIAM.
Robert Hauss, (the Appellant), appeals his sentence imposed as a result of his conviction and adjudication of guilt for multiple counts of D.U.I. The Appellant argues that the written order does not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence.
The State has conceded error in this case. Therefore, we affirm the Appellant's conviction, but remand to the trial court to enter a written order conforming to the trial judge's oral pronouncement at sentencing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
