1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 817 A.2d
  5. 817 A.2d 962 (2002)
 

KOTKIN v. ARONSON

817 A.2d 962 (2002)

358 N.J. Super. 284

Ross KOTKIN and Audrey Kotkin, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Bernard ARONSON and Estelle Aronson, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 9, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin D. Sheehan argued the cause for appellants (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys; Jay M. Herskowitz, on the brief).

Richard I. Rosenberg argued the cause for respondents (Rosenberg & Goldstein, attorneys; Mr. Rosenberg, on the brief).

Before Judges BRAITHWAITE and WEISSBARD.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Bernard Aronson and Estelle Aronson ("the Aronsons" or "the sellers") appeal from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs Ross Kotkin and Audrey Kotkin ("the Kotkins" or "the buyers"). We affirm.

In August 2000 the Aronsons entered into a contract to sell their home in Cherry Hill to the Kotkins, who deposited $10,000 upon the signing of the contract. The contract provided the buyers with the right to have a home inspection covering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases