DANTLEY v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY

No. 00-CV-1672.

801 A.2d 962 (2002)

Paulette DANTLEY, Appellant, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 27, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paulette Dantley, pro se.

Timothy F. McCormack, and Hope D. Miller were on the brief, Baltimore, MD., for appellee.

Before RUIZ and REID, Associate Judges and PRYOR, Senior Judge.


REID, Associate Judge.

On June 26, 2000, the Superior Court entered summary judgment on appellant Paulette Dantley's breach of contract claim against Howard University. On appeal, she argues that summary judgment in favor of Howard was inappropriate as a matter of law, because her contract with Howard University was broken when she was terminated pursuant to a reduction-inforce. Determining that summary judgment was inappropriate in this case, we reverse the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases