PAUL v. TIMCO, INC.


811 A.2d 948 (2002)

356 N.J. Super. 180

Marie Rose PAUL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIMCO, INC. t/a Planet Honda, and Honda Care a/k/a Honda Easy/Care, APCO, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 20, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simon L. Kaufman, Edison, argued the cause for appellant (Kohn & Needle, attorneys, Maplewood; Mr. Kaufman, on the brief).

Neil E. Guthrie, Monmouth, argued the cause for respondent Timco, Inc. t/a Planet Honda (Baldinger & Levine, attorneys; Bruce E. Baldinger, Bridgewater, on the brief).

Shawn C. Huber, Westmont, argued the cause for respondent Honda Care and APCO (Brown & Connery, attorneys; Mr. Huber, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, CUFF and LEFELT.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

The question presented by this appeal is whether a purchaser of a product who paid additional money for an extended warranty may be required to arbitrate a claim under the warranty even though the document requiring arbitration was not sent to the purchaser until after the sales transaction. We conclude that the purchaser of a warranty may not be compelled to arbitrate warranty claims where the only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases