1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 788 A.2d
  5. 788 A.2d 906 (2002)
 

JOHNSON v. BENJAMIN MOORE & CO.

788 A.2d 906 (2002)

347 N.J. Super. 71

Theodore JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. BENJAMIN MOORE & COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and Peter Bishop and Ellen Singer, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter J. Tencza, Jr., Metuchen, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent.

Patrick J. Monaghan, Jr., Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Monaghan, Monaghan, Lamb & Marchisio, attorneys; Mr. Monaghan and Mark F. Heinze, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, KESTIN and STEINBERG.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Theodore Johnson, appeals from the dismissal of his complaint that had asserted that defendant, Benjamin Moore & Co., based its Crayola Paints program on various concepts plaintiff had disclosed to it without paying for his ideas and his proposed product line. Plaintiff's proposal had described a do-it-yourself art project called Mural in a Can, consisting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases