1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 794 A.2d
  5. 794 A.2d 893 (2002)
 

PIPPIN v. FINK

794 A.2d 893 (2002)

350 N.J. Super. 270

Kayla PIPPIN, a minor by and through her natural mother Guardian ad Litem, Joan Pippin, and Joan Pippin, individually and in her own right, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Carol FINK, Defendant-Appellant, v. Christine Agresta, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 17, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stacy Moore, Jr., Marlton, argued the cause for appellant Carol Fink (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys; Mr. Moore, on the brief).

Stephen Guice, Barrington, argued the cause for respondent Kayla Pippin.

William J. Golden, Woodbury, argued the cause for respondent Christine Agresta.

Before Judges STERN, COLLESTER and PARKER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER, J.A.D.

Pursuant to leave granted, defendant Carol Fink appeals from an order denying her summary judgment, on a complaint against her for injuries to the infant plaintiff as a result of a dog bite.

The relevant facts are that on Saturday, May 23, 1998, Kayla Pippin, along with other children Amanda Baliff, Justin Baliff and a girl named Jessie, walked to 122 Albany Avenue in Barrington to use the pool on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases