LAIDLOW v. HARITON MACH. CO., INC.


790 A.2d 884 (2002)

170 N.J. 602

Rudolph LAIDLOW and Jean Laidlow, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARITON MACHINERY COMPANY, INC., Defendant, and Richard Portman and Advanced Metallurgy AMI-DDC Inc., a Division of Technitrol, Defendants Respondents, and Jay Hill Industries, Inc., United Engineering and Foundry Co., Inc., Art Wire/Doduco, UESC Inc., Wean Inc., Barto Inc., United Engineering Inc., United Foundry Inc., Danieli United, a Division of United Foundry Inc., Joseph Yasenka, Individually and t/a Jay Hill Industries, Jay Hill Industries, an unincorporated entity, AA Co., Inc., BB Co., Inc., CC Co., Inc., DD Co., Inc., said names being fictitious; John Doe, Richard Roe, Richard Doe and John Roe, said names being fictitious, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 25, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth J. Fost, Morristown, argued the cause for appellants (Fost, Muscio & Caruso, attorneys).

Kenneth E. Pogash, Roseland, argued the cause for respondent AMI-DDC, Inc. (Guida, Fabricant & Bressler, attorneys).

John J. Murphy, III, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for respondent Richard Portman (Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, attorneys; Mr. Murphy and Francis X. Manning, on the brief).

Michael A. Galpern, Cherry Hill, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Association of Trial Lawyers of America-New Jersey Chapter (Greitzer and Locks, attorneys; Mr. Galpern and Margaret M. Allen, of counsel and on the brief).

Michael J. Marone, Morristown, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Companies (McElroy, Deutsch & Mulvaney, attorneys; Mr. Marone and Richard J. Williams, Jr., of counsel and on the briefs).


The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, J.

The Workers' Compensation system has been described as an historic "trade-off" whereby employees relinquish their right to pursue common-law remedies in exchange for prompt and automatic entitlement to benefits for work-related injuries. Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 174, 501 A.2d 505

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases