1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 125 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 125 Cal.Rptr.2d 42 (2002)
 

CUMMING v. SAN BERNARDINO REDEVELOPMENT

No. E030566.

125 Cal.Rptr.2d 42 (2002)

101 Cal.App.4th 1229

Stewart D. CUMMING et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

Rehearing Denied September 6, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Christopher D. Lockwood, San Bernardino, and Delmar Williams, San Diego, for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of James DeAguilera and James DeAguilera, Redlands, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino (the Agency) appeals from a judgment granting a petition for writ of mandate. The petition asserted that the Agency had violated CEQA, the California Environmental Quality Act, when it approved the sale of redevelopment property by the Agency to California Bio-Mass, Inc. (Bio-Mass). Stewart Cumming and the Cimarron Ranch Neighborhood Association (Cimarron...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases