1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 796 A.2d
  5. 796 A.2d 866 (2002)
 

MUSIKOFF v. JAY PARRINO'S THE MINT, L.L.C.

796 A.2d 866 (2002)

172 N.J. 133

Harvey MUSIKOFF, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAY PARRINO'S THE MINT, L.L.C. and Jaspar Parrino, alias Jay Parrino, Defendants. Stark & Stark, a Professional Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 16, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis J. Pepperman, Lawrenceville, argued the cause for appellant (Stark & Stark, attorneys; Mr. Pepperman, Scott I. Unger and John R. Sawyer, of counsel and on the brief).

Bonnie M. Weir, Newark, argued the cause for respondent (Kern Augustine Conroy & Schoppmann, attorneys; Steven I. Kern, of counsel, Bridgrwater; Ms. Weir and Mr. Kern, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by VERNIERO, J.

We are called on to answer a question of law certified and submitted by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. This is the first time that this Court will answer such a question pursuant to the procedures set forth under Rule 2:12A. The inquiry involves N.J.S.A. 2A:13-5, known as the Attorney's Lien Act (the Act). As certified, the question is:

Whether under New Jersey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases