OLARTE v. CROCKER


881 A.2d 776 (2002)

380 N.J. Super. 203

Jose A. OLARTE and Mary Olarte, Plaintiffs, v. Fred CROCKER, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided September 25, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacqueline Rodriguez for plaintiff (Chet Preston, attorney).

Karen E. Heller, Springfield, for defendant (Mortenson and Pomeroy, Attorneys).


DE LUCCIA, J.S.C.

In this case, the court is required to determine whether a certification authored by a chiropractor is compliant with the requirements of the Automobile and Insurance Cost Reduction Act of 1998, L. 1998, c. 21 (AICRA). This court is persuaded that a chiropractor qualifies as a "physician" within the purview of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.

The matter is before the court by way of defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases