APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES v. LUDEMANN

No. 1673, Sept. Term, 2001.

811 A.2d 845 (2002)

148 Md. App. 272

APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, et al., v. Kevin R. LUDEMANN.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

December 2, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel E. Ogden (Anthony J. Zaccagnini and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellants.

Lawrence Melfa (Samuel M. Grant and Howard, Butler & Melfa, P.A., on the brief), Towson, for appellee.

Argued before JAMES R. EYLER, BARBERA, and JOHN J. BISHOP, (Retired, specially assigned), JJ.


BARBERA, Judge.

The principal issue we decide in this appeal is whether the date of a work-related accident must be identified with certainty in order for an employee to recover benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act. We hold that such certainty is not required. We also decide the propriety of the court's denial of a mid-trial continuance request that came in the midst of a tragic national occurrence—the September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases