1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 289 F.3d
  5. 289 F.3d 1367 (2002)
 

CROWN OPERATIONS INTERN., LTD. v. SOLUTIA INC.

No. 01-1144.

289 F.3d 1367 (2002)

CROWN OPERATIONS INTERNATIONAL, LTD. and Marshall H. Krone, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOLUTIA INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied: June 10, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph T. Leone, DeWitt Ross and Stevens, S.C., of Madison, WI, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Joseph A. Ranney.

Gregory E. Upchurch, Thompson Coburn LLP, of St. Louis, MO, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Kenneth R. Heineman, and Dudley W. Von Holt.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Crown Operations International, Ltd., and Mr. Marshall H. Krone (collectively "Crown"), appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin denying Crown declaratory relief that Solutia's U.S. Patent No. 4,973,511 ("the '511 patent") is invalid for lack of novelty and non-obviousness, and that Solutia's U.S. Patent No. 5,091,258 ("the '258 patent") is invalid for lack of enablement and written description...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases