1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 307 F.3d
  5. 307 F.3d 1343 (2002)
 

ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES v. DYNAMIC DETAILS

No. 02-1010.

307 F.3d 1343 (2002)

ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DYNAMIC DETAILS, INC., and GSI Lumonics Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: October 7, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold J. McElhinny, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Marla J. Miller, Jill D. Neiman; and Ronald P. Oines, Morrison & Forester, LLP, of Irvine, CA.

Don Martens, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Newport Beach, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Paul A. Stewart, Douglas G. Muehlhauser, and Paul D. Tripodi II.

Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment that Dynamic Details, Inc. and GSI Lumonics, Inc. (collectively GSI Lumonics) do not infringe Electro Scientific Industries (ESI's) United States Patent No. 5,847,960 ('960 patent). Electro Sci. Indus. v. Dynamic Details, Inc., SA CV 00-272 AHS (Aug. 14, 2001). Because the district court granted summary judgment based on an erroneous claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases