IN RE ESTATE OF ROCCAMONTE


808 A.2d 838 (2002)

174 N.J. 381

In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Arthur J. ROCCAMONTE, Sr. Mary Theresa Sopko, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Doreen Slackman, Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur J. Roccamonte, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 23, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel C. Seltzer, Union, argued the cause for appellant.

Michael J. Breslin, Jr., Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Waters, McPherson, McNeill, attorneys; James J. Seaman, Secaucus, on the brief).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D. (temporarily assigned).

This palimony case brought by plaintiff Mary Sopko against defendant the Estate of Arthur Roccamonte is before us by reason of a dissent in the Appellate Division. R. 2:2-1(a)(2). The majority concluded as a matter of fact that a fair reading of the record in the trial court compelled the finding that decedent Roccamonte had made an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases