1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 305 F.3d
  5. 305 F.3d 1337 (2002)
 

CREO PRODUCTS, INC. v. PRESSTEK, INC.

Nos. 01-1634, 02-1023.

305 F.3d 1337 (2002)

CREO PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRESSTEK, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 17, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Krupka, Kirkland & Ellis, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Boaz Brickman, Marc Cohen, Brian Arnold, and Nick Saros, of Los Angeles, California; and Jay I. Alexander and Gregory F. Corbett, of Washington, DC.

Daniel S. Ebenstein, Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Ira E. Silfin and W. Scott McClave.

Before CLEVENGER, RADER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Creo Products, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that two patents belonging to Presstek, Inc., are not invalid. Presstek cross-appeals from the district court's judgment that Creo's on-press imaging system does not infringe either of Presstek's patents. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases