1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 297 F.3d
  5. 297 F.3d 1343 (2002)
 

DEPRENYL ANIMAL HEALTH v. UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

No. 01-1648.

297 F.3d 1343 (2002)

DEPRENYL ANIMAL HEALTH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO INNOVATIONS FOUNDATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund J. Sease, McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C., of Des Moines, IA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Jeffrey D. Harty and Ronald M. Sotak.

J. Michael Jakes, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Michael A. Morin. Of counsel were Robert F. Shaffer and Dennis P. O'Reilley.

Before GAJARSA, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant, Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. ("DAHI"), seeks review of the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas dismissing the case in its entirety. The district court held that the exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant-appellee, the University of Toronto Innovations Foundation ("UTIF"), would violate due process. Consequently, the district court granted UTIF's motion to dismiss for lack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases