1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 761 N.E.2d
  5. 761 N.E.2d 856 (2002)
 

VAN WINKLE v. NASH

No. 49A05-0103-CV-109.

761 N.E.2d 856 (2002)

Rhea K. VAN WINKLE, Appellants-Defendant, v. Amanda L. NASH and Brian M. Nash, Appellees-Plaintiffs.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

January 10, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Smith, Smith Fisher Maas & Bishop, Indianapolis, IN, for Appellant.

James A. Mellowitz, Price Potter Jackson & Mellowitz, Indianapolis, IN, for Appellees.

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Rhea K. Van Winkle appeals the trial court's award of prejudgment interest and certain costs to appellees-plaintiffs Amanda L. Nash and Brian M. Nash (the Nashes) with respect to their personal injury claim against Van Winkle. Specifically, Van Winkle claims that IND.CODE §§ 34-51-4-1 to -9 (the Tort Prejudgment Interest Statute) is unconstitutionally void...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases