1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 794 A.2d
  5. 794 A.2d 816 (2002)
 

TARTAGLIA v. PAINE WEBBER, INC.

794 A.2d 816 (2002)

350 N.J. Super. 142

Maria TARTAGLIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAINE WEBBER, INC. and Herb Janick, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 3, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennet D. Zurofsky, Newark, argued the cause for appellant (Reitman Parsonnet, attorneys; Mr. Zurofsky, on the brief).

Robert H. Bernstein, Newark, argued the cause for respondents (Epstein Becker & Green, attorneys; Mr. Bernstein, of counsel; Donald S. Barth, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, EICHEN and LINTNER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, P.J.A.D.

Pursuant to leave granted, plaintiff appeals from an order requiring her to destroy copies of computer generated information taken from defendant Paine Webber, and enjoining her from revealing the contents and using them during the trial. As detailed in the trial court's reported opinion, Tartaglia v. Paine Webber, Inc., 342 N.J.Super. 182, 184-87,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases