1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 793 A.2d
  5. 793 A.2d 810 (2002)
 

O'CONNOR v. O'CONNOR

793 A.2d 810 (2002)

349 N.J. Super. 381

Kathleen M. O'CONNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. O'CONNOR, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 27, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. DeFuccio, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant (Rose & DeFuccio, attorneys; Larry J. Esposito, on the brief).

Paul N. Ambrose, Jr., Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Schiffman, Berger, Abraham, Kaufman & Ritter, attorneys; Mr. Ambrose, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, FALL and AXELRAD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FALL, J.A.D.

In this post-judgment matrimonial matter, we again address the troubling issue of a parent's application to remove the child of the dissolved marriage to another state as a result of that parent's need to relocate. Justice Long succinctly posed the dilemma as follows:

Ideally, after a divorce, parents cooperate and remain in close proximity to each other to provide access and succor to their children...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases