1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 793 A.2d
  5. 793 A.2d 805 (2002)
 

ABRAHAM v. TWP. OF TEANECK ETHICS BD.

793 A.2d 805 (2002)

349 N.J. Super. 374

John ABRAHAM, Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK ETHICS BOARD, Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 25, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard A. Kuttner, Milburn, and John Abraham, pro se, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Abraham, on the brief).

Martin R. Cramer, Beverly, argued the cause for respondent Township of Teaneck Ethics Board (Ruden & Cramer, attorneys; Mr. Cramer, on the brief).

David Samson, Attorney General, attorney for respondent Local Finance Board, Department of Community Affairs (Keith A. Costill, Deputy Attorney General, filed a statement in lieu of brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CIANCIA and PARRILLO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PARRILLO, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a final determination of the Local Finance Board of the Department of Community Affairs (Board) adopting the initial decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ), which found that appellant John Abraham, while Mayor of the Township of Teaneck, violated the Local Government Ethics Law, specifically N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.6(4), by failing to disclose his interest in a company known...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases