1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 45 P.3d
  5. 45 P.3d 114 (2002)
 

DYMOCK v. NORWEST SAFETY PROTECTIVE EQUIP.

(CC 16-98-18369; CA A105112; SC S48333).

45 P.3d 114 (2002)

334 Or. 55

Frederick C. DYMOCK, Jr., Respondent on Review, v. NORWEST SAFETY PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR OREGON INDUSTRY, INC., an Oregon corporation, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided April 25, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terrence J. Hammons, Hammons & Mills, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review.

David L. Jensen, Jensen, Elmore & Stupasky, P.C., Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, LEESON, RIGGS, and BALMER, Justices.

LEESON, J.

The issue on review in this case is whether plaintiff stated a claim for wrongful discharge after defendant terminated plaintiff's employment for refusing to sign an agreement that included a nonsolicitation provision. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint. The Court of Appeals reversed. Dymock v. Norwest Safety Protective Equipment, 172 Or.App. 399, 401,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases