1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 793 A.2d
  5. 793 A.2d 780 (2002)
 

H.E.S. v. J.C.S.

793 A.2d 780 (2002)

349 N.J. Super. 332

H.E.S., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.C.S., Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 21, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clement F. Lisitski, Ocean City, argued the cause for appellant.

Michele C. Verno, Linwood, argued the cause for respondent (Ackerman Alsofrom & Verno attorneys; Ms. Verno, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, CUFF and WECKER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WECKER, J.A.D.

This domestic violence case requires us to address questions of procedural due process as well as the required elements of harassment and stalking as predicate acts under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 to -35 ("the Act").

Defendant J.C.S. (hereinafter "J" or defendant), the husband of plaintiff H.E.S. (hereinafter "H" or plaintiff), appeals from a final restraining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases