1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 60 P.3d
  5. 60 P.3d 95 (2002)
 

STATE v. HAMPTON

No. 26357-2-II.

60 P.3d 95 (2002)

114 Wash.App. 486

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Malcolm HAMPTON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

As Amended December 20, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rita Joan Griffith, Kevin R. Cole, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, Leslie E. Talzin, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

Kit Proctor, John M. Neeb, Barbara Corey-Boulet Deputy Pros. Attorneys, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART

MORGAN, P.J.

The main question in this appeal is whether a properly issued warrant to search the defendant's person for drugs authorizes a reasonably executed search not only of most of his person, but also of the area between his penis and scrotum. Answering yes, we affirm.

Within 72 hours of January 28, 2000, a confidential informant (CI) reported to the police that he/she had seen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases