1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 639 N.W.2d
  5. 639 N.W.2d 886 (2002)
 

CARLSON v. CHERMAK

No. C8-01-1475.

639 N.W.2d 886 (2002)

Dorothy B. CARLSON, et al., Appellants, v. Darlene CHERMAK, Douglas County Recorder, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 26, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Neilson, Babcock, Neilson, Mannella, LaFleur & Klint, P.L.L.P., Anoka, MN, for appellants.

Paul Donald Reuvers, Iverson Reuvers, L.L.C., Bloomington, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, HANSON, Judge, and FOLEY, Judge.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.*

Appellant landowner Dorothy Carlson unsuccessfully sought a variance from respondent Douglas County's shoreland development ordinance. She did not appeal the denial by the Douglas County Board of Adjustment (BOA), but five months later, after the 30-day statutory period for appeal had run, she commenced this declaratory-judgment action challenging the applicability and enforceability of the shoreland ordinance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases