1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 776 N.E.2d
  5. 776 N.E.2d 730 (2002)
 

BAGNOLA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LAB.

No. 1-00-0224.

776 N.E.2d 730 (2002)

333 Ill. App.3d 711

267 Ill.Dec. 358

James A. BAGNOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, and City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division.

August 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Romanucci & Blandin, Chicago (Stephan D. Blandin and Christopher P. Carr, of counsel), for Appellant.

Baker & McKenzie, Chicago (Michael A. Pollard and David G. Wix, of counsel), for Appellee SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories.

Mara S. Georges, Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Chicago (Lawrence Rosenthal, Benna Ruth Solomon and David Graver, of counsel), for Appellee City of Chicago.

Justice FROSSARD delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, James Bagnola, appeals an entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories (SBCL) and the City of Chicago (City) on his cause of action for spoliation of evidence. In 1991, the Chicago police department ordered plaintiff, a Chicago police officer, to submit to random drug testing. Plaintiff submitted two urine specimens, which were sent to SBCL for testing. Both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases