KMART CORP. v. COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS

Nos. C7-01-446, C9-01-447, C0-01-448.

639 N.W.2d 866 (2002)

KMART CORPORATION, Relator, v. COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 28, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Wilhelmy, Laurie J. Miller, Minneapolis, Relator's Attorney(s).

Alan L. Mitchell, St. Louis County Attorney, Barbara A. Russ, Michael R. Dean, Duluth, Respondent's Attorney(s).

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


BLATZ, Chief Justice.

OPINION

This consolidated property tax appeal raises the question of the sufficiency of income information relator provided pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 278.05, subd. 6(a) (2000), the 60-Day Rule. The tax court ruled that the income information provided within the statutory deadline was insufficient and dismissed relator's chapter 278 petitions for failure to comply with the statute. We affirm.

Relator Kmart Corporation filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases