STATE v. STOSKOPF

No. C4-01-1473.

644 N.W.2d 842 (2002)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Daniel Arthur STOSKOPF, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 28, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Michael D. Williams, Marshall County Attorney, Warren, MN, for respondent.

David D. Dusek, Grand Forks, ND, for appellant.

Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge, RANDALL, Judge, and STONEBURNER, Judge.


OPINION

R.A. RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction for driving in violation of the no-alcohol restriction on his driver's license. Appellant argues that the results of a preliminary breath test should be suppressed because appellant was not given the implied-consent advisory before the test was administered. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 17, 2001, around 3:00 p.m., Sergeant Dean Smith of the Minnesota State Highway Patrol observed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases