1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 645 N.W.2d
  5. 645 N.W.2d 837 (2002)
 

AMUNDSON v. AMUNDSON

No. 21883.

645 N.W.2d 837 (2002)

2002 SD 60

E. Paul AMUNDSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Pamila K. AMUNDSON, Respondent and Appellee.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine V. Piersol and Leah Piersol Crain of Piersol Law Office, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellant.

Thomas J. Farrell and Sara E. Eng of Strange, Farrell & Johnson, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellee.

ENG, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] E. Paul Amundson (Paul) brought a petition to terminate alimony after his ex-wife, Pamila K. Amundson (Pamila) remarried. Before the court hearing on the petition, Pamila was granted an annulment of her five month second marriage. Following the alimony termination hearing, the court determined the alimony payments should continue. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] The parties divorced on November 2, 1998, with three children...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases