1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 644 N.W.2d
  5. 644 N.W.2d 838 (2002)
 

SENSKE v. SENSKE

No. C3-01-2209.

644 N.W.2d 838 (2002)

In re Lawrence A. SENSKE, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Deanna D. SENSKE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Wertheimer, Little Canada, for respondent.

David Gronbeck, Law Offices of David Gronbeck, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge, WILLIS, Judge, and FOLEY, Judge.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.*

Appellant challenges the district court's decision that respondent retained a nonmarital interest in a home's equity even after the property was refinanced. Appellant also argues that, because the equity no longer has a nonmarital component, the Schmitz formula, used to determine what portion of an increase in a property's value is nonmarital, is inapplicable. Both parties challenge the district court's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases