ENTECH CORP. v. CITY OF NEWARK


798 A.2d 681 (2002)

351 N.J. Super. 440

ENTECH CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEWARK, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided January 9, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Kiel, Hackensack, for plaintiff, (Cole Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys).

William J. Schwartz, First Assistant Corporation Counsel, for defendant, City of Newark.

Mark L. Fleder and Damon McDougal, Roseland, for Spiniello, intervenor-defendant, (Connell Foley, LLP, attorneys).


JACOBSON, J.S.C.

INTRODUCTION

On November 16, 2001, Entech Corporation filed an Order To Show Cause and a Verified Complaint in Lieu of Prerogative Writs against the City of Newark, growing out of the City's selection of Spiniello as the low bidder on Brick Sewer Rehabilitation, Phase III/IV (G) Sewer Rehabilitation Contract No. 08-WS2000. The City notified Entech on October 12, 2001, that Entech's bid—although...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases