1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 795 A.2d
  5. 795 A.2d 669 (2002)
 

DEUTSCH v. BARSKY

Nos. 00-CV-114, 00-CV-168.

795 A.2d 669 (2002)

Daniel DEUTSCH, et al., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Stephen BARSKY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided April 11, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Modell, Washington, DC, for appellants/cross-appellees.

Geoffrey P. Gitner, Washington, DC, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and TERRY and REID, Associate Judges.

REID, Associate Judge:

This case involves the validity of a covenant not to compete which is set forth in an agreement between two dentists, appellants/cross-appellees Dr. Daniel Deutsch and Daniel J. Deutsch. D.D.S., P.C. (collectively, "Dr.Deutsch"), and appellee/cross-appellant Dr. Stephen Barsky, who in effect ended their "partnership." After determining that the contract damages flowing from the breach of the covenant could not be ascertained, the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases