1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 307 F.3d
  5. 307 F.3d 1143 (2002)
 

DAVID v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. 00-57091.

307 F.3d 1143 (2002)

Edwin F. DAVID, on behalf of himself and a class of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 9, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Kent, Irvine, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Renée J. Laurents, Office of the City Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee.

Before KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge.

Opinion by Judge FERNANDEZ; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge.

Edwin David brought this action on the basis that the procedures used by the City of Los Angeles after a car has been towed and stored for an alleged parking violation do not comport with the demands of due process. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. The district court granted summary judgment against David and in favor of the City. We affirm in part...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases